The influence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide on anticentromere antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients

that anticentromere antibody (ACA)-positive primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) shows a clinical phenotype intermediate between ACA-negative SS and systemic sclerosis (SSc) [1]. In our past study investigating the clinical features of 62 patients with positive ACA, only one patient had typical CREST syndrome, 9 patients had Raynaud’s phenomenon (8 with sclerodactyly, telangiectasia or calcinosis), while rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the most common diagnosis (21 patients) [2]. Th ereafter, we investigated whether ACA-positive RA patients have distinctive clinical features compared to general RA patients [3] and found that the high titer group (over 1:320) was associated with Raynaud’s phenomenon more often. Th is result suggests that RA patients are also aff ected by high titer ACA, similar to SS patients. Recently, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) has emerged as a useful diagnostic tool in RA. In order to examine any association between anti-CCP and ACA positivity in RA patients, we investigated 81 ACApositive patients using an anti-CCP test from 2007 until May 2010 (Table 1). Interestingly, out of 34 RA patients, 70.6% (24) were positive for anti-CCP, and there was no case of accompanying Raynaud’s phenomenon among them. For ACA-positive RA with negative anti-CCP, only one patient (10%) had Raynaud’s phenomenon, similar to our past result (15.7%) [3]. In contrast, the incidence of interstitial pulmonary disease was 11.8% (4 out of 34), higher than in our past report (4.2%) [3], and this was unrelated to anti-CCP positivity. Th ese results suggest that the infl uence of anti-CCP is greater than ACA in determining the disease entity and masks even the infl uence of ACA on the clinical phenotype inter mediate with SSc. Th is is supported by a report that anti-CCP is useful for discriminating between SSc-RA and SSc alone [4]. We think that the infl uence of anti-CCP on the disease entity is greater than that of ACA. Th is would mean that the diagnostic impact of disease-associated auto antibodies is diff erent depending on their natures, although they can exert some infl uence on the expression of specifi c clinical features. Th erefore, although a patient is positive for ACA, we suppose that clinical symptoms may be diff erent depending on the kind of coexisting auto antibody. (Th e information in our study was recorded in a manner that subjects cannot be identifi ed directly, so this study was not reviewed by our internal review board under the US Department of Health and Human Services regulations at 45 CFR 46.101(b)(4). Under the same regulations, informed consent was also not required.) © 2010 BioMed Central Ltd The infl uence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide on anticentromere antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients